Pensions committee investigates why WASPI complaints are being closed ahead of state pension age judicial review

Published by Stephen Little on 20 December 2018.
Last updated on 20 December 2018

Unhappy pensioner

The parliamentary Work and Pensions Select Committee is investigating why complaint cases from women affected by state pension age changes have been closed ahead of a judicial review. 

Labour MP Frank Field, chair of the cross-party Work and Pensions Select Committee, has written to the pensions minister Guy Opperman for further information on complaints made by women born in the 1950s hit by changes to the state pension age.

It comes after a high court judge granted a judicial review to determine whether recent increases to women’s state pension age were lawful.

Writing in the letter, dated 12 December, Mr Field says the committee has received a number of complaints from women affected by the changes to the state pension age accusing the Department for Work and Pensions of maladministration.

He says that the committee has received evidence that the Independent Case Examiner, which reviews complaints about government departments, has closed the cases of several women ahead of the upcoming judicial review.

Mr Field asked for confirmation of the number of cases closed following the announcement of the judicial review. The chair also requested a reason why the cases were being closed, which at this time is unclear. 

The MP also requested information on how many more cases the minister expected to close and what legal advice the DWP took before closing cases. 

In a reply, Mr Opperman admitted he would not be able to answer Mr Field’s request in time for the 18 December deadline, but said he would follow up with a response "as soon as possible".

The Royal Court of Justice granted BackTo60, a campaign group representing women who have been affected by the rise in state pension age, a judicial review in November.

State pension changes for women

The state pension age for women was raised in November to 65 – the same as men – for the first time.

It has been steadily rising from 60 since 2011 and in 2020 the age for both sexes will rise to 66.

However, the increase in age to the state pension has drawn widespread criticism.

Campaign groups such as BackTo60 and Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) argue that many women born in the 1950s were not warned of the changes and as a result have suffered financial hardship.

Some women stopped working after expecting to receive a pension, but the changes have left them with little time to make alternative plans.

Pensions made simple with PensionBee

Advertisement
  • Combine your old and lost pension pots into one online plan
  • Take complete control and have 24/7 access to your pension balance
  • Your own dedicated BeeKeeper (account manager)
  • Make withdrawals online from the age of 55

Leave a comment

BORN AUG 1954 ... TO RECEIVE

BORN AUG 1954 ... TO RECEIVE PENSION JULY 2020. PLEASE SEND ME UPDATES ON THE LATEST WASPI/PENSION INFORMATION. THANK YOU!

I was born August 1957 and

I was born August 1957 and was expecting my pension age 60 until I got caught up in the changes so I would really like to know how this will go . Thank you

I left school at 15 and

I left school at 15 and worked in a factoy which was very hard and after having a son could only get cleaning work as no qualifications i am all for women being treated the same as men but men have always ee payed better than women so im shocked that i have to work till 66 it is very unfair im so tired and dont know how to cope with the extra years

I feel the same thank you

I feel the same thank you

I was born in this country

I was born in this country October 1955, worked all my life and paid a full stamp, qualified for a full state pension by the time I reached 50 years old. Expected to retire at 60 but, discovered that I can't until 2021 at the age of 66 years old, also discovered that the I cannot now claim for the Winter Fuel Allowance either, because of the year I was born. Currently living on EESA due to medical health conditions which now makes me unemployable even by the DWP standard. Suffering terrible on just £221.50 a fortnight......My reward for being a hard working british woman!!!

I was born in 1953 December

I was born in 1953 December 13th I’ve worked hard all my life even when I had children I left school at 14 1/2 so had no qualifications either .
I had no notification they were not paying my pension at 60 no letter ever came I called in the November & was told I had to wait till March 2019..
why March I’m 65 now have they not taken enough already without 3 more months money.
It is legal criminality..
Woman of the 50’s were not even allowed to have operations without a signature from their husband we didn’t have extra pensions men had them we have been very badly treated and no one gives us the respect we deserve.
I also thought I would get fuel allowance but no I didn’t get that either..
It’s terrible mostly they have taken from women who had far different lives. Than women today. .

I agree - I was born December

I agree - I was born December 31st 1953 and although I did get a letter when the first increase in pension age came about, I had to go online to find out about the double whammy. I am also annoyed and frustrated that I won't get the full State Pension because of something called COPE deduction - I am being penalized because I paid into a Pension Scheme which was supposed to give me MORE money when I retired not less. This was not explained to me at the time and I think it was just as misleading as the miss sold PPI's - why has nobody brought this up before?

I started working at the age

I started working at the age of 15 and have paid my taxes , I wasn't ever notified that I would not receive my pension until I was 66 why did the government put up ours , when they could have bought mens' down to 60 , it was because they saw a way of saving money and took it . I am fed up with people saying older people are draining the state ,don't lets forget that it was us who built it up in the first place ,the baby boomers have paid a lot in ,why should't we get back ,just a small amount of what after all (we have paid in )