Pensions committee investigates why WASPI complaints are being closed ahead of state pension age judicial review

20 December 2018

The parliamentary Work and Pensions Select Committee is investigating why complaint cases from women affected by state pension age changes have been closed ahead of a judicial review. 

Labour MP Frank Field, chair of the cross-party Work and Pensions Select Committee, has written to the pensions minister Guy Opperman for further information on complaints made by women born in the 1950s hit by changes to the state pension age.

It comes after a high court judge granted a judicial review to determine whether recent increases to women’s state pension age were lawful.

Writing in the letter, dated 12 December, Mr Field says the committee has received a number of complaints from women affected by the changes to the state pension age accusing the Department for Work and Pensions of maladministration.

He says that the committee has received evidence that the Independent Case Examiner, which reviews complaints about government departments, has closed the cases of several women ahead of the upcoming judicial review.

Mr Field asked for confirmation of the number of cases closed following the announcement of the judicial review. The chair also requested a reason why the cases were being closed, which at this time is unclear. 

The MP also requested information on how many more cases the minister expected to close and what legal advice the DWP took before closing cases. 

In a reply, Mr Opperman admitted he would not be able to answer Mr Field’s request in time for the 18 December deadline, but said he would follow up with a response "as soon as possible".

The Royal Court of Justice granted BackTo60, a campaign group representing women who have been affected by the rise in state pension age, a judicial review in November.

State pension changes for women

The state pension age for women was raised in November to 65 – the same as men – for the first time.

It has been steadily rising from 60 since 2011 and in 2020 the age for both sexes will rise to 66.

However, the increase in age to the state pension has drawn widespread criticism.

Campaign groups such as BackTo60 and Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) argue that many women born in the 1950s were not warned of the changes and as a result have suffered financial hardship.

Some women stopped working after expecting to receive a pension, but the changes have left them with little time to make alternative plans.


In reply to by Sandra Paul (not verified)

Sandra I'm as unhappy as you, born 54, no SP until March 20 but you are playing right in to the governments hands by lashing out at benefit claimants. Of course there are always people who abuse the system but to aim your anger at them & not mention the billions lost due to tax evasion & avoidance is very unhelpful to the cause of the many & really benefits the super rich "few" Focus you anger towards them rather than the "just about" managing

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

I left school at 15 and worked in a factoy which was very hard and after having a son could only get cleaning work as no qualifications i am all for women being treated the same as men but men have always ee payed better than women so im shocked that i have to work till 66 it is very unfair im so tired and dont know how to cope with the extra years

In reply to by Kathleen Thomas (not verified)

I was born in 1953 December 13th I’ve worked hard all my life even when I had children I left school at 14 1/2 so had no qualifications either .I had no notification they were not paying my pension at 60 no letter ever came I called in the November & was told I had to wait till March 2019.. why March I’m 65 now have they not taken enough already without 3 more months money.It is legal criminality..Woman of the 50’s were not even allowed to have operations without a signature from their husband we didn’t have extra pensions men had them we have been very badly treated and no one gives us the respect we deserve.I also thought I would get fuel allowance but no I didn’t get that either..It’s terrible mostly they have taken from women who had far different lives. Than women today. .

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Iv worked since i was 16. Paid a full stamp. Expecting to retire at 60, My husband who is now retired has been retired for a year. Thought we would be spending it togeather. I have had to take on a part time job to make ends meet, iv paid 35 years of national insurance. But stillhave to wait another 5 years till i get my pension. So unfair. The goverment are saving millions.

In reply to by Caroline Bradley (not verified)

I also agree with comments, I was born 22nd December 1953 and worked most of my life.As i recall they actually moved the goal post twice, i was originall informed i would have to work until i was 63 and then they changed it again. I officially receive my state pension from today. That works out at arround £40,000 they have stolen from me.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

HelloI was born August 1954, and not made aware of this change to my pension, found out from a work colleague who was able to retire at 60!Please can you keep me informed on changes and the judicial review in June this yearThank you

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

I started working at the age of 15 and have paid my taxes , I wasn't ever notified that I would not receive my pension until I was 66 why did the government put up ours , when they could have bought mens' down to 60 , it was because they saw a way of saving money and took it . I am fed up with people saying older people are draining the state ,don't lets forget that it was us who built it up in the first place ,the baby boomers have paid a lot in ,why should't we get back ,just a small amount of what after all (we have paid in )

In reply to by Caroline Bradley (not verified)

I agree - I was born December 31st 1953 and although I did get a letter when the first increase in pension age came about, I had to go online to find out about the double whammy. I am also annoyed and frustrated that I won't get the full State Pension because of something called COPE deduction - I am being penalized because I paid into a Pension Scheme which was supposed to give me MORE money when I retired not less. This was not explained to me at the time and I think it was just as misleading as the miss sold PPI's - why has nobody brought this up before?

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

I was born August 1957 and was expecting my pension age 60 until I got caught up in the changes so I would really like to know how this will go . Thank you

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)


In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

They have closed my case ahead of the judicial review. Please keep me informed of any updates.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Born August 1954 robbed of close to six years pension . Now carer for 91 year old mother saving the government a fortune obviously would do it anyway but not the point .

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

BornAugust 1954 have had 5years and 10 1/2 months of pension stolen . Waspi woman .

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

I was born in this country October 1955, worked all my life and paid a full stamp, qualified for a full state pension by the time I reached 50 years old. Expected to retire at 60 but, discovered that I can't until 2021 at the age of 66 years old, also discovered that the I cannot now claim for the Winter Fuel Allowance either, because of the year I was born. Currently living on EESA due to medical health conditions which now makes me unemployable even by the DWP standard. Suffering terrible on just £221.50 a fortnight......My reward for being a hard working british woman!!!

In reply to by Liz (not verified)

I am confused. I was born September 1954. Even after all the changes I was expecting to get my SP in September 2018 when I became 65. As, following the changes the law is now that the pension age goes up to 66 in October 2020. Why are the government paying my pension a week before I’m 66 and not on my 65th birthday?

In reply to by Lynne hickey (not verified)

I feel the same thank you

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Our government are an absolute disgrace. They are pen pushers on high inflated salarie who do not live in the real world.I at 60 like many others have worked since the age of sixteen and entered in to a contract where we would pay our NI and get our pension at 60.Surely it is illegal that the government have broken this contract.We are fed up watching benefits given to people who want to lie in their beds and not work and are so good at acting and lying that they can pass any review to carry on receiving benefits which we are paying for.Unlike MPS many of us have worked extremely hard on low wages making it impossible to save for pensions.Our government are like children in a playground. If they spent less time power seeking and getting on with the jobs in hand we would all be better for it.This country is heading for a Revolution and when this happens I will be on the front line.Sandra Paul East Lothian

re late payment of womens staye pension

hi. like many of the ladies above, I was born I, December 1953, and was also NOT informed of the changes that would apply to me, I have paid my Dues(worked) for 45yrs, and was firstly told when I phoned that I would get the full pension of £160.00 pr wk... oh yeah right, but when I started to receive (late) in March 19 the SP it was for only £154!! I would like to see some of our MP,S live on that for a while. they said this was due to the fact that for 2yrs I paid into(contracted out) of SERPS, this was due to their advice in the first place (another Con I think)
Feeling very angry and out of pocket to the tune of £50,000.

Add new comment