Woodford ejected from the UK equity income sector

Kyle Caldwell
23 March 2018

Neil Woodford has become the latest name to be ejected from the Investment Association’s (IA) UK equity income sector. 

His flagship fund, LF Woodford Equity Income, failed to beat or match the yield on the FTSE All Share index over the past three years. Those who fail this hurdle over this time period are expelled from the sector.

Over the three-year period LF Woodford Equity Income produced an average yield of 3.5%, below the FTSE All Share index yield of 3.6%.

A spokesperson for Woodford Investment Management says the way Neil Woodford invests is ‘not dictated by yield considerations’. 

"Throughout his 30-year investment career, Neil has focused on delivering positive long-term total returns through a combination of income and capital growth for his flagship equity income funds. 

"He believes this strategy is in the best interests of his investors; he has never been willing to sacrifice capital to supplement income in the short term and his portfolio construction isn’t dictated by yield considerations," adds the spokesperson. 

The yield requirement used to be tougher, as funds previously had to achieve a yield of 110% over a three-year rolling period to retain their place in the sector. Last March, however, the yield requirement was lowered following the expulsion of around a fifth of the sector, with 20 or so funds failing the yield test. 

Most funds that have been expelled tend to end up in the IA’s UK all companies sector and this is where LF Woodford Equity Income will now reside. Other income funds that sit in the sector include Evenlode Income and Mr Woodford’s former funds: Invesco Perpetual High Income and Invesco Perpetual Income.

The yield requirement is controversial as it can punish strong performance.

For example: fund A starts the year at a price of £1 per unit and ends the year at £1.10 per unit, producing an income of 5p over the year. The historic yield of the fund is therefore calculated as 4.55% (5p/110p).

Fund B, meanwhile, starts the year at a price of £1 per unit and ends the year at £0.90 per unit, producing an income of 5p over the year. The historic yield of the fund is calculated as 5.56% (5p/90p).

The spokesperson for Woodford Investment Management adds that ahead of the yield requirement for the sector being watered down by the IA, it had recommended that the trade body should instead remove the headline yield target, as it does not effectively capture the impact of dividend growth over the long term.

"Neil's focus for the LF Woodford Equity Income fund (and his previous equity income funds) has been, and always will be, on delivering a particular level of income per share, rather than a specific yield. From the outset, Neil said he would aim to deliver 4p based on the launch price of £1, and grow that income each year. That commitment remains," says the spokesperson. 

Source: Northern Trust

This artice first appeared on our sister website Money Observer


In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

I am spitting feathers at thd poor performance of this fund and Neil

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

The bottom line is that Neil Woodford makes money based upon how much he has under his control, so he will say anything to preserve that. Yields are rubbish in general across most investments - it's pitiful to see 4% as a target for an investment where there is any risk, while inflation runs around 3%. This effectively means that there only needs to be a 1% diminution in the capital for there to be zero real return. In other words you are putting your money in somebody else's hands and they are the only one benfiting from it. Investment managers got a free ride on the 2017 bull market, but now we can see that there is no value in paying for investment management. I can't speak for Woodford's funds, but I see it with my own investments.

Add new comment