Tracker funds: Investment for all ages

Published by Rebecca O'Keeffe on 19 November 2013.
Last updated on 19 November 2013


What is more, investors in these funds are, on average, more than five years younger than active fund investors, according to figures from Interactive Investor. So what is the attraction of passive investment and does it make sense for this age bias to exist?

The fund management industry is founded upon the belief that markets are inefficient; not all information is widely or freely available and, even if it is, this information is not efficiently priced into the market. Active fund investors believe expert fund managers, studying specific countries and sectors and analysing individual companies, can create a fund that will perform better for investors than holding a passive basket of individual stocks.

But while there is no doubt opportunities and anomalies in the market have existed in the past, the key question is whether those opportunities still exist now?

The increase in technology, global awareness and computer trading neutralised many of the pricing anomalies that previously existed and from this, the passive fund market emerged. Passive fund advocates consider markets are broadly efficient and that while active managers might be able to find good exceptions, they are just as likely to find companies that underperform.

The passive fund market thinks an investor who wants exposure to a particular country or sector should just buy into a fund which mimics the relevant index – and with a computer rather than an individual making any underlying changes to a passive fund portfolio, they can do it for a fraction of the annual management fee that is charged by their active fund equivalents.

The passive versus active debate has run and run since passive funds arrived 20 years ago, and figures do tend to show that on average, over most longer timeframes, passive funds perform better.There will always be exceptions to this and, of course, it is only possible to be able to invest in a passive fund if you have a particular benchmark you're trying to match, such as the FTSE 100. But for investors who simply want to take the first step on the investing ladder, passive funds offer significant appeal.

Age no barrier

So should younger investors or older investors consider tracker funds as a good fit for their portfolio?

Instinctively, one might expect young investors would be taking a more active role in their investments and older investors would move into more of these tracker funds, but we've seen exactly the opposite. While active funds are still by far and away the preferred option, it appears as if an increasing number of investors who are starting out are starting and staying with passive funds.

With less time, less money, and possibly less interest in investing, while also appreciating that stepping on to the investing ladder is necessary, low-cost tracker funds are a great choice for new investors.You don't have to worry as much whether you've made the right choice, because you're automatically settling for benchmark returns. Younger investors are also likely to be investing for growth, rather than generating income from their investments, so overall, it is easy to see why passive funds appeal.

Older investors who are moving into income generation and supplementing retirement will be choosing high-yielding options, in particular for their Isa investments, where the non-declarable and no further tax to pay angle from income makes it a highly attractive choice. With more time and probably more money, it is easier to take an active role.

Passive fund investing might seem like a cop-out to some, but if you have a long time horizon and want an investment that requires less of your time, then it's a great place to start.

Rebecca O'Keeffe is the head of investment at Interactive Investor. Email her at

More About

Leave a comment