The prudent should be rewarded - not punished

What is the point of saving?

It’s a question I am increasingly being asked by an army of readers at The Mail on Sunday, and I’m not sure I have a convincing answer to give them.

There is no doubt that cash savers - young and the elderly - have paid a heavy (unfair) price for the folly of the banks and their reckless lending in the 2000s. Interest rates have been slashed, inflation remains untamed and both banks and building societies have prioritised the rebuilding of their depleted capital bases over giving savers a fair deal.

Although headline interest rates of 3% gross look half decent - you can get more if you are prepared to lock into a fixed rate - many of these deals are riddled with bonuses that are withdrawn as quickly as they are given.

Most savers are now earning no more than 0.1% interest per year on their hard-earned money. To make matters worse, the government has rubbed salt into savers’ wounds by withdrawing its popular inflation-linked savings products.

It is no wonder, then, that Sir Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, says he has “great sympathy” for pensioners struggling with low interest rates and rising living costs.

Things are not going to get better either, in the short term at least. Recent research conducted on behalf of Saga, an organisation that waves the flag for the over-50s, concludes that annual pensioner household incomes will be £1,318 lower in April 2014 than they were in April 2009 as a result of low interest rates and the government’s policy of printing money to revitalise the economy (quantitative easing).

As Dr Ros Altmann, director general of Saga, says: “The current generation of pensioners, especially those newly retired, have often saved diligently for their retirement but are finding that the cards have been stacked against them just as they need to draw their income.

"This is likely to provide a major disincentive to younger generations who will see pensions and savings disappointing those who sacrificed current consumption to provide for their own future.”

So what can savers do?

So, against this backdrop of record-low interest rates, can anything be done for savers?

Some people are now calling for tax on cash savings – a minimum 20% – to be removed. They argue, rather convincingly, that a savings tax is a form of double taxation and so penalises prudence. But at a time of great austerity, it’s something George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, could not seriously entertain.

Others believe banks and building societies should be doing more for savers. The Daily Mail has launched a campaign to this end, calling on the savings industry to give people deposit accounts that are “simple and encourage people to keep putting away money for the long term”. It also wants pensions and investments “where charges do not wipe out any profits”.

I believe the government could go some way to alleviating the current pain for cash savers by simplifying the rules on tax-friendly ISAs. It is utter madness that only half of the annual £11,280 ISA allowance can be put in a bank or building society deposit account where interest accumulates free of tax.

It means that for the full allowance to be used, someone must be prepared to invest in the markets – something most elderly people do not want to do and many younger people are uncomfortable doing (especially if saving for a home deposit).

I believe if the government allowed cash savers to use the full annual ISA allowance, it would send out a message that it cares about the prudent, the elderly and the young who want to save for the future - the backbone of this wonderful country.

I’ve set up an e-petition calling on the government to do exactly this. If 100,000 people sign it, the issue could get debated in the House of Commons, just in time for the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement, where any positive announcement on ISAs could be made. It’s time for savers to get a fairer deal.

Moneywise is fully backing Jeff's petition. To sign it go to

More about

Your Comments

I scrimped and scraped my whole working life but still only get half state pension because in the 60s/70s most women had no option but to stay home and care for their children
i then cared for grandchildren and elderly parents and had a small legacy
My savings are always kept in the highest rate accounts i have a balanced portfolio of shares and some bonds
Contrary to B of E claims none of my assetts has increased since 2008 and dividends have nose dived
but worst of all is interest rates on savings these have now dropped by 50% hence my income has nose dived from 16K to 9K so whilst previously i would have benefiited from removing tax on savings now i am in queer street and the pathetic words of "sympathy" from Mervyn King does not pay the bills
He and the MPC coin in over £250K a year each yet they have not one ounce of commonsense or integrity let alone economic sense and the Treasury is too sttupid to see that the income i and others like me have lost multiplyed across the country is precisely why theres no growth and low tax revenue
I wish i had never saved and simply held out my hands for benefits