How to survive an ultra-low interest rate environment

Just six days after the referendum result was announced, Bank of England governor Mark Carney suggested Brexit would force an interest rate cut this summer. The warning immediately scared investors into seeking a more secure home for their money than shares.


Cash poured into gilts – bonds issued by the UK government, which are considered a safe haven in times of trouble – pushing up their prices so that the yields on some actually became negative. Anyone who bought the March 2018 gilt the day after Mr Carney’s interest rate warning will actually lose money on their purchase if they keep the investment until it matures in 20 months’ time.

The Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee in July voted to leave the base rate - which is used by banks and building societies as a guide for settingtheir own savings and mortgage interest rates - unchanged. But economists expect a cut in August and for the base rate to stay low for several years.

Howard Archer, chief European and UK economist for IHS Economics, expects the base rate to stay at this incredibly low level until 2020.

He says: “This reflects the fact that I think the UK economy is likely headed for stagnation and very possibly mild recession in the near term followed by very gradual recovery amid prolonged uncertainty.”

This is the last thing that most savers will want to hear. People who have been relying on savings interest to boost their income are currently earning a pitiful average of 1.02%, according to independent savings adviser That means someone with £100,000 saved in the bank or building society is doing well to be getting more than £1,000 annual savings income.

Savings rates are now likely to fall even lower. Sue Hannums, director of the website, says: “The past seven years have been horrendous for savers. The Bank of England base rate fell to record low levels and government schemes were launched to boast lending, both of which sent savings rates on a downward spiral that they have never recovered from.”

In the eight months before the launch of the government’s Funding for Lending scheme in August 2012, there were 22 cuts to the interest rates paid by savings accounts, according to figures collected by Savings Champion. Since then there have been a staggering 4,682 cuts (see Savings Champion chart, below).

Ms Hannums says: “Providers no longer need a reduction in the base rate to cut savings rates, as they did in the past, although any downward movement in the base rate is unlikely to pass by without a reaction from most, if not all, the banks and building societies,” she says.

Savings accounts – keep switching

The recent stock market turmoil means that for many people, despite the low interest rates on offer, cash remains king because of the security it appears to offer.

Rachel Springall of financial product comparison service Moneyfacts says speedy action could be vital to secure the best rates: “If providers are swamped with new money too quickly then the best buy deals could well be withdrawn from the market. Therefore, anyone looking to save may be wise to consider doing so while there are still some decent deals left to choose from.”

Ms Hannums says savers should also keep their money on the move to improve returns: “Switching if your rate becomes uncompetitive or when your bond matures is vital to stay in the very best rates possible. With rates at their current level, it’s never been more important to switch, as every little helps.”

One thing that should cause savers less trouble is finding an account that outstrips inflation, as the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate of inflation measured a very modest 0.3% rise in May (the latest figure available at the time of writing).

Starting with cash individual savings accounts (Isas), for those looking for a long-term deal to see them through the next five years, United Trust Bank pays 2.05% gross on sums from a minimum of £5,000, while Nationwide pays 2% gross on deposits from £1. Saga pays 1.8% gross on £1or more for three years for those aged 50 or more, while Shawbrook Bank pays 1.7% gross from a minimum of £5,000 regardless of the saver’s age.

Leeds Building Society meanwhile, pays 1.4% from a minimum of £100 for two years. All of these Isa accounts either refuse access or will deduct interest if savers need to withdraw money before the end of the fixed rate term.

If you have already used your cash Isa allowance, Raphaels Bank offers the highest paying five-year fixed-rate bond set at 2.35% with a minimum investment of £5,000. Vanquish Bank pays 2.16% gross for four years, while Chartered Savings Bank pays 1.91% gross and 1.79% gross for two years and one year, respectively. None of the fixed-rate bonds allow savers to access their capital during the fixed- rate period.

These rates were correct on 8 July, but remember with the base-rate being cut, bank and building society savings rates are likely to change rapidly. Visit our best cash Isa rates page for the latest rates.


Retirement income worries

Prospects for those who are approaching retirement and intend to buy an annuity to provide pension income are also now very worrying.

Annuity rates, which are based on gilt yields at the point of purchase of the annuity contract, are set for the entire remaining life of the purchaser. So someone who has to buy their annuity in the next few months or even years, will being buying into an unescapably low income that will not improve even if the economy picks up.

Annuity rates have already fallen, with retirees aged 65 now being offered worse levels of pension income than those aged 60 just six months ago.

Tom McPhail, pension expert at investment broker Hargreaves Lansdown, says: “We’re into uncharted territory now, so it is hard to predict whether annuity rates have further to fall or how much lower they might go.”

As we seem to be saddled with ultra-low savings rates for the foreseeable future, cautious savers and investors may have to manage their money with extra care and even take on extra risk to keep returns at a survivable level.

(Click on the graph below to enlarge)

Pensioners should consider drawdown

A ‘comfortable’ retirement for the average person in the UK requires an annual income of £27,000, according to insurer MGM Advantage.

To generate that kind of income from an annuity, eight years ago a 65-year-old would have needed a pension fund of £343,949. But now, they would need £552,373, and the amount being quoted by annuity companies is increasing daily. Hargreaves Lansdown’s Tom McPhail says: “Annuity quotes are typically guaranteed for two to four weeks, so investors who [already have an annuity quote and] are worried about a further drop in rates should get their skates on.”

You should, as always, shop around different annuity providers to make sure you get the best deal – do not just accept the quote supplied by your pension provider. If you suffer from any medical condition that could have an impact on how long you expect to live, check whether you are eligible for the higher income paid by an ‘enhanced’ annuity.

Even then, the low amounts of income on offer may encourage some investors who are risk averse to consider putting their pension into ‘drawdown’, leaving the pension money invested and drawing an income directly from the pension pot, rather than buying a guaranteed annuity.

Martin Bamford, a chartered financial planner with independent financial adviser Informed Choice, says: “Low interest rates have a big impact on retirement planning, as they mean lower yields across all types of investments. If you are tempted away from the security of an annuity income to the flexibility of income drawdown, making your pension pot last for the rest of your life is an important consideration. Cautious investors using income drawdown should consider keeping a healthy cash reserve, so they are not forced to sell investment units when markets have fallen.”


He suggests that investors keep enough of their fund invested in cash to cover three years’ worth of planned withdrawals. “This is usually long enough to avoid being forced into selling investment units when the markets have dipped, but not so much that it acts as a significant drag on long-term returns,” he says.

Mr Bamford says the rest of the pension pot can then be invested in a diversified portfolio of equities, bonds and property with the aim of capital growth over the longer term. “It is important to review income levels and investment performance at least annually, adjusting the portfolio composition and withdrawal rates accordingly,” he adds. “A realistic withdrawal rate is probably 2.5% to 3%, if you want to reduce the risk of your pension pot running out before the end of your life.”

Mr McPhail points out that eight years ago people also felt that annuities offered poor value of money: “Who’s to say that in five years’ time, today’s rates won’t look like a bargain?” He suggests that investors hedge their bets by splitting their pension fund, allocating some of it to an annuity and keeping some in drawdown.

He adds that it is imperative for investors to build inflation-proofing into their pension arrangements: “Given the fall in sterling in the past couple of weeks, it may not be possible to avoid inflation creeping back into the economy over the months and years ahead. If you invest in a portfolio of funds or shares with prospects of dividend growth and only draw the natural yield on your investments, then you should enjoy income growth over time.” [Drawing the natural yield means taking the annual dividend payouts in the case of shares, or the coupon payments from bonds, but leaving the capital untouched.]


Investing for a higher income

Maike Currie, investment director for personal investing at Fidelity International, says savers may have to move out of their comfort zone to generate the income they need. “To stand a chance of generating a real return, you may need to move money further up the risk spectrum, investing in slightly riskier bonds issued by companies rather than governments, or consider moving into equities,” she says.

Cautious investors who previously would not have considered investing in stock market-based funds may find that they no longer have any choice, adds Mark Dampier, investment expert with Hargreaves Lansdown. He cites his 91-year-old mother, Christine, as an example of why cash savings will no longer provide the income necessary for many people to survive, let alone have a good standard of living.

“My mum is about to sell her home to buy and move to a bungalow in a sheltered accommodation development much closer to me and my brother,” he says. “This will leave her with about £400,000 to invest, but she will need additional services, which I think will cost between £500 and £1,000 a month. There is no way we can generate the money needed if we put the proceeds from her home into savings, so I am thinking of an income and capital fund which is generating about 4%. That will produce £16,000 a year – enough to meet her needs, plus some.”

But Mr Dampier is upbeat about the prospects for shares over the next four to five years. “I don’t know where else people will get their income from,” he says.

He recommends reducing risk by investing in a wide spread of shares through unit trusts, open ended investment companies (OEICs) and investment trusts, rather than trying to select individual shares. “Dividends can be cut on individual shares, but I’ve never known a fund go from offering a 5% yield to nothing,” he says.


Income investment suggestions

Mr Dampier says the Marlborough Multi Cap Income and JO Hambro Equity Income funds both yield more than 5%, and the JO Hambro fund has grown dividends by around 10% a year over the last few years. He suggests dovetailing these funds with the CF Woodford Income and Artemis Income funds.

Your Comments

"The Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee has now voted/is expected to change the base rate for the first time in seven years, cutting it from an already low 0.5% to 0.25%."
What does that mean and when did it happen?

Thanks for pointing out the mistake. The article was written before the July rate decision and we have now corrected it. 

It seems to me that Brexit is going to get blamed for everything now. Alot of these things were well underway before hand. We need to be postive and stop all these negative comments. I feel alot of people just cannot handle that we could be much better off with out all the red tape from Brussels. We now have the chance to use common sense in this Country that for one should be good for business. Come get a grip we can prosper with out Mr Jolly Junker & his leeches and we can make a much better job of it.