How BHS administration affects staff pensions: what you need to know

BHS logo

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has started to assess the BHS pension scheme, following the retailer’s collapse this week, in a move that is likely to see it take responsibility for the final salary pensions of some 20,000 existing and former employees.

The BHS pension scheme currently has a deficit of £571m.


I’ve got a BHS final salary pension. What does its administration mean for me?

Only members of the BHS final salary (defined benefit) scheme will be able to claim under the PPF.

The final salary scheme was closed to new members more than 10 years ago and currently less than one in 10 employees is still a member of this scheme.

Tom McPhail, head of retirement policy at Hargreaves Lansdown says: “For now, BHS scheme members will see very little change in how the pension scheme is administered. It will continue to be run by its existing administrators and trustees.

“Under the rules of the PPF scheme, retired members will continue to receive 100% of their existing pension; however new retirees will now only receive 90% of their entitlement, capped at £33,678.38. This means higher earners could receive less than 90% of their pension entitlement. Over time members’ payouts will also now receive lower inflationary increases, meaning the value of their pensions may diminish in real terms.” 


However, as yet it is unclear how long it will take for the PPF to take on responsibility for the scheme.

Mr McPhail adds: “The PPF will now conduct an assessment of the scheme’s assets and liabilities, which could take some considerable time. In an unusual move, the Pensions Regulator has indicated that they may pursue Sir Philip Green for additional contributions to the BHS scheme. This could delay the PPF assessment process, which will not be concluded until all available money has been brought into the BHS scheme.”

I’ve got a BHS defined contribution pension. What does its administration mean for me?

The majority of employees will have defined contribution pensions, which will not be directly affected by the collapse of BHS as the money is invested separately.


What is the Pension Protection Fund?

The PPF was launched in April 2005 following concerns that if a company with a final salary pension collapsed and became unable to meet its pension liabilities the members of the scheme would lose their retirement income.

However, the limitations of the PPF mean that while retired employees who are already in receipt of their pensions will have all their payments covered, those that are yet to retire will see their incomes cut.

Does the Pension Protection Fund have enough money to pay for BHS pensions?

Contrary to popular belief, the PPF is funded by an annual levy on defined benefit pension schemes and has no direct support from the taxpayer. Mr McPhail says that if it was ever to start running out of money it could increase the levies it charges pension schemes or reduce the payouts it provides. 

“The Protection Fund is currently in surplus, with around 115% of the money needed to meet all its promises; it has assets in excess of £20 billion, so whilst this situation is clearly not good news for the current and former employees of BHS, there is a robust safety net there to catch them.”

The government’s Work and Pensions Committee is also looking into the PPF and the effect that the BHS collapse will have on it.

Frank Field MP and committee chair says: “We need as a Committee to look at the Pension Protection Fund and how the receipt of pension liabilities of BHS will impact on the increases in the levy that will now be placed on all other eligible employers to finance the scheme. We will then need to judge whether the law is strong enough to protect future pensioners’ contracts in occupational schemes."

Mr McPhail adds: “The DWP Committee review could open up some more fundamental questions around the long term viability of final salary scheme promises more generally, given the £300 billion deficit which exists today when all UK schemes are added together.”

More about

Your Comments

There is a subtle mistake in this article about the workings of the PPF.
The 10% cut in pensions (plus the 'cap') actually applies to anyone* who is below their "Normal Retirement Age", even if they started receiving their pension early.
The 10% cap is only disapplied if someone is older than their NRA at the time that the assessment for PPF entry commences.
Its frequently quoted in the press than the 10% cut "does not apply to pensioners" - this is not the full picture. The distinction is not pensioner or nonpensioner?, but above NRA or below NRA?
*apart from those receiving a widow/widower/dependant pension, or pensioners who retired early on grounds of ill-health. 

Hi - yes if you retired below normal retirement age, you would still only get 90%. The 100% cover only kicks in for those who have passed their normal retirement age.