Government guilty of prioritising broadband speed over coverage
The government’s strategy for broadband has been criticised by the Lords Communications Committee for focusing on speeds rather than coverage.
Rather than investing in delivering faster broadband speeds, the report says the government should be focusing on closing the digital divide and ensuring that all homes and businesses across the UK had a reliable broadband connection.
The report states: “Government policy has become pre-occupied with the delivery of certain speeds to consumers. The delivery of certain speeds should not be the guiding principle; what is important is the long term assurance that as new internet applications emerge, everyone will be able to benefit, from inhabitants of inner cities to the remotest areas of the UK.”
It describes access to the internet as a “domestic essential” and said the “widening digital divide was becoming a profound source of concern”.
Dominic Baliszewski, telecoms expert at broadbandchoices.co.uk, agrees the government had the wrong priorities.
“The government has provided plenty of rhetoric around their ‘broadband for all' promise but in reality resource has focused on providing super fast speeds to homes that are already well-connected in comparison with rural communities - a sceptic might say they've backed the easier one to deliver.”
He adds: “Closing the ‘digital divide' will not be achieved by attempting to win the broadband speed race. Whilst faster speeds are an important aspiration, they should not be prioritised at the expense of rural households being left in digital ghettos.”
Term assurance provides cover for a fixed term with the sum assured payable only on death. Term assurance premiums are based primarily on the age and health of the life assured, the sum assured and the policy term. The older the life assured or the longer the policy term, the higher the premium will generally be. There are generally two types of term assurance. Level term assurance premiums are fixed for the duration of the insurance term and a payment will only be made if a death occurs during the insurance period and with decreasing term assurance, life cover decreases during the insurance term reducing the cash payout the longer the term runs and this is reflected in the premium.
Generally thought of as being interchangeable with insurance but isn’t. Assurance is cover for events that WILL happen but at an unspecified point in the future (such as retirement and death) and insurance covers events that MAY happen (such as fire, theft and accidents). Therefore you buy life assurance (you will die, but don’t know when) and car insurance (you may have an accident). Assurance policies are for a fixed term, with a fixed payout, and unlike life insurance have an investment aspect: as a life assurance policy increases in value, the bonuses attached to it build up. If you die during the fixed term, the policy pays out the sum assured. However, if you survive to the end of the policy, you then get the annual bonuses plus a terminal bonus.