Worst firms for complaints to be named
Financial firms that receive the most complaints from customers will be named and shamed for the first time this summer, under new plans announced by the watchdog.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) says companies that receive 500 or more complaints in a six-month period will have to publish this information twice a year.
They will be required to disclose not only how many complaints they have received, but also how these were dealt with. The pressure will be on firms to resolve complaints within an eight-week period – if not, this information will also have to be shared.
Perhaps most importantly for many people who have had their fingers burnt by firms in the past, companies will also have to publish the number of complaints upheld in favour of the customer.
The FSA has set 31 August 2010 as the first deadline for affected firms to publish their figures. The watchdog will then publish a consolidated set of data the following month.
The data will be divided by five product areas: banking; home finance; general insurance and pure protection; life and pensions; and investments.
"For the first time, people will be able to see how many complaints particular firms receive and how they handle them,” says Sheila Nicoll, director of conduct policy at the FSA.
She adds that such transparency will result in companies improving their customer service and will also provide an incentive for them to deal more effectively with complaints received.
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) already publishes its complaints data. In September it revealed that just five banking groups accounted for more than half of the complaints made against financial firms in the first six months of 2009.
This data refers to the number of complaints that, having been rejected by firms, are passed on for the Ombudsman to be reviewed.
According to the FSA, nearly nine million complaints were made against financial services firms between 2006 and 2008, driven by grievances against current accounts and mis-sold mortgage endowments.
Meanwhile, Consumer Direct has revealed the top 10 complaints in 2009 from consumers - with second-hand cars coming in at number one for the fourth year running.
Its advisers answered more than 1.5 million calls and emails last year and recorded almost 850,000 complaints against traders.
In total, 50,790 complaints were made about second-hand cars bought from independent dealers, up 8% on the previous year. Complaints about TVs came second while complaints about mobile phone service agreements came third.
More than half of all complaints concerned goods and services bought at the traders' premises, 13% were purchased online and 10% were bought by telephone.
|Second-hand cars (from independent dealers)||50,790|
|Mobile phones (service agreements)||22,172|
|Mobile phones (hardware)||18,470|
|Laptops, notebooks and tablet PCs||17,611|
|Car repairs and servicing from independent garages||16,387|
|Second-hand cars purchased from franchise dealers||14,693|
|Telephone services (landlines)||11,631|
|Source: Consumer Direct|
Good customer service is like gold dust, so take part in the Moneywise Customer Service Awards 2010 and tell us which providers offer the best service and value for money.
Enter our competition and you could win £1,000.
The Financial Services Authority is an independent non-governmental body, given a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers in order to meet its four statutory objectives: market confidence (maintaining confidence in the UK financial system), financial stability, consumer protection and the reduction of financial crime. The FSA receives no government funding and is funded entirely by the firms it regulates, but is accountable to the Treasury and, ultimately, parliament.
If you’ve have a complaint about a financial service product you have bought but the company you bought it from refuses to resolve your problem after eight weeks, the Ombudsman can help. The Ombudsman will investigate and resolve the matter. The Ombudsman is independent and its service is free to consumers. The Ombudsman may find in the company’s favour but consumers don’t have accept its decision and are always free to go to court instead. But if they do accept an Ombudsman’s decision, it is binding both on them and on the business.