Start investing today with just £50

Last updated: May 4th, 2011
Feature by Rob Griffin

Any investment guide will tell you that the key to successful investing is ensuring you have a balanced portfolio with a broad range of assets.

But while this is all well and good for people with thousands of pounds to lock away, what about those savers investing for the first time who can't afford to invest huge sums or build an entire portfolio from scratch?

In the first of our new three-part series, we look at options for those with £50 a month to invest.

See also: Start investing with £100 a month

              : How to invest a lump sum

Taking three typical 'amateur' investors as an example, we show the factors you need to consider and provide tips on the funds most likely to make your money grow as you dip your toe into the investment waters.

INVESTOR ONE

Currently single, Investor One is 27 and climbing the career ladder as a PA in the City. She recently purchased a house and has sensibly set aside six months' savings in cash in case the unexpected happens.

Now she wants to start growing her wealth. As far as investment risk is concerned, she describes herself as fairly adventurous and is keen for her money to work as hard as she does.

Because she doesn't expect to call on the money any time soon, she's happy to take a long-term view.

What she needs to think about...

Investment risk is best taken when you're young. If her investments do well she'll be sitting on a rising sum of money, but if markets move against her she'll have plenty of time to rebuild her wealth before retirement.

As Investor One can cope with the fact that her investments could fall in value, she should stick with equities rather than cash or fixed-interest investments like corporate bonds and gilts.

And given her long-term outlook, she should consider focusing on foreign shores with some money in the emerging markets.

Although such investments are more volatile, the long-term returns are likely to be better than returns from the larger, developed economies such as the US or Europe.

For example, the average fund in the IMA Global Emerging Markets sector has risen 152% over the past decade, according to figures compiled by Morningstar.

Contrast that with the average fund in the IMA Cautious Managed sector, which has gone up a more modest 37% over the same period, or those in the IMA UK All Companies sector that have only managed an average uplift of 16%.

Moneywise recommends...

Fund: First State Global Emerging Markets Leaders
Manager: Jonathan Asante
Value of £100 invested three years ago: £156.92

Dennis Hall says: "With her age and investment time horizon, there is likely to be a larger weighting to equities. Anyone who has been following this sector will already know that First State has an excellent track record in Asia Pacific, where many of the emerging markets are located."

Other funds worth considering: Aberdeen Global Emerging Markets & Schroder Global Emerging Markets

INVESTOR TWO

Investor Two is 35 years old, married, with two young children. As far as his investments are concerned, he has conflicting objectives – while he naturally wants his money to work as hard as possible and beat the lousy interest rates on offer at the bank, having a young family means he can't afford to risk losing it all.

Ideally, he'd like to line his nest so that he is in a position to help his kids out when they grow up.

What he needs to think about...

Making returns without losing anything along the way is the Holy Grail for investors, but the bad news is that whatever Investor Two does with his money he'll incur some risk.

Even if he tucks it away in a savings account, he may see its effective value shrink, unless it's earning a rate of interest higher than inflation.

Investor Two is a prime candidate for a balanced investment strategy. Funds in this area will contain a variety of assets – from relatively safe fixed-income to higher-octane equity components.

So they will enjoy some benefit if stockmarkets roar ahead, but will also have an element of protection should they turn sour.

The flipside of such a strategy, of course, is that returns will lag in soar-away markets because the diversified nature of the portfolio will dilute returns.

However, for someone like Investor Two, who is worried about losing all his money in a sudden downturn, these sort of funds won't keep him awake at night.

Moneywise recommends...

Fund: Invesco Perpetual Distribution
Manager: Paul Causer and Paul Read
Value of £100 invested three years ago: £114.45

Dennis Hall says: "I would look for a simple managed fund that has approximately 60% in bonds, including government and corporate bonds, and the other 40% in blue-chip shares. This fund fits the bill and also allows regular monthly savings from as low as £20, which makes it attractive to a wide range of savers."

Other funds worth considering: AXA Distribution, Jupiter Merlin Income Portfolio & Schroder Multi-Manager Cautious Managed

INVESTOR THREE

Our third investors are a married couple aged 40 and 44. They have reached the stage in their lives when they are concerned that the money currently being put away in their pensions will not be enough to give them the lifestyle they'd like in retirement.

Although they don't want to set up another pension, the couple would like another savings plan in order to top up their future retirement income.

As their longer-term plan is to use this money to fund holidays and luxuries (they should have enough to cover their basic expenses), they are happy to take a calculated risk.

What they need to think about...

This couple are in the enviable position of having already started to cater for their retirement basics, and they are now looking for some added extras.

However, they don't want to take too many chances. In this respect, their risk appetite sits somewhere between Investors One and Two.

While they are not quite adventurous enough to go 100% into emerging markets, neither are they overly cautious, as they still have around 20 years before retirement. Therefore, they probably require exposure to equities.

Although the couple doesn't have any dependants, they will have to pay close attention to their existing pension plans, the value of which could be vulnerable to any future downturns.

In this scenario, they may need to consider using the money they are planning to tuck away into the extra pot to bolster their retirement savings instead.

Moneywise recommends...

Fund: CF Miton Strategic Portfolio
Manager: Martin Gray
Value of £100 invested three years ago: £126.94

Dennis Hall says: "I was split between a global equity fund such as the M&G Global Growth fund and multi-asset fund CF Miton Strategic Portfolio. I opted for the latter – which currently has a higher percentage of assets held in cash and bonds – as the former is predominantly weighted towards equities, which could be more volatile over the longer term."

Other funds worth considering: M&G Global Growth, Newton Balanced Income & SVM Global

Moneywise's investment rules

Our investors may have different objectives but they must all follow the same basic principles before deciding where to invest.

The first is to clear outstanding debts. Obviously, it will be impossible to pay off your mortgage before you invest, but credit cards should certainly be cleared.

Even the best investment is unlikely to deliver a return that's greater than the interest you're being charged.

The second rule is to have some cash set aside in an easy access account in case of emergencies. Ideally, this should equate to six months' salary.

After all, you never know when your boiler will pack up, or even worse, you lose your job or fall ill.

More about

Your Comments

Great advice Rob!! Even though I'm not a financial planner, I couldn't disagree with any of the strategies suggested in each of the 3 cases. It's all about your risk apetite.

It's sad that a website that pretends to be concerned about small-scale financial rip-offs here and there (which do need identifying), is quite happy to encourage people to invest in the same gigantic, 'investment' and 'risk' outlets that have produced the recent financial crisis (and no doubt even worse diisasters to come), whilst at the same time attempting to divert people's anger by encouraging hostility to public sector pensions which argely apply to people who have spent a lifetime (not just the past few years) in some of the lowest payest jobs in society. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Very interesting but one thing in the Moneywise investment rules at the end concerns me "Even the best investment is unlikely to deliver a return that's greater than the interest you're being charged. "
If this is the case why would anyone invest?

Thank you, it seems good sensible advice. It is especially helpful that you show the thought processes involved. I expect the comment referring to the interest being charged should continue 'on your credit card', or suchlike. Meaning to clear that first. One can only feel sorry for the very bitter comment by someone who appears to be full of envy, or to have suffered a big loss. I started investing in the 80's. Thanks to reading Moneywise, and financial sections of the week end papers, I had a basic knowledge that stood me in very good stead and protected me from many possible mistakes. Thank you! We can never be completely protected, but knowledge is a great help, and if we go in without it we have only ourselves to blame. It's up to us.

Sad to say but whilst currencies continue to be printed in vast amounts and spent on bonds and stocks in the form of QE, and deposit rates are so low as to mean you actualy loose money thanks to inflation, then the wave of money pumps up the price of stocks and any other likely tangible assets such as gold and commodities. In this scenario it 's clear that money is indeed merely a 'form of exchange' and not a 'store of value'.
Savers have been severly punished whilst holders of large mortgages and debts have been rewarded by the lowest interest rates for decades.
Whilst it is moraly indefensable to penalise savers like this it is the result of the negligence of politicians who have caused this entire crisis both in the UK and the USA. At some point in tme the whole asset bubble will burst when China starts selling some of the huge amounts of USA treasury bonds it holds.

One guest is worried that the commission is greater
than the interest. Well if they invest via Hargreaves
Lansdown who PAY the initial commission ect, they will not
be in that situation...........

I stop investing because of diabolical interest rates, the government is more concerned about mortgage payers (minority) paying less for their mortgages than savers (majority) getting a decent income return on their capital. I am unemployed to no fault of my own and I have to (burn) all but £5500 to get benefits of any kind!

I agree with some of your reader comments investing is for those people who can afford to lose money,I have lost out in the last twenty years, thanks to an Independant Financial Advisor:
1) on pensions,I was persuaded by to exchange a deferred final salary Company pension into a private pension, BIG MISTAKE, and like lots of the public I was unaware of the advertising campaign run by the FSA on mis selling ,my advisor assured me everything was fine, until at 65 it was too late to appeal against the sale.
2) Endowment policies, encouraged by everyone in the 80's,
3)Free Standing additional voluntary contributions,take out a private one says my Independant Financial Advisor,I could have taken out one with my Company.
All three recommendations by a so called Financial advisor were total failures,and we are supposed to trust them,I do remember them boasting once that the difference between their advice and publications such as yours was that they would be liable for their advice to the regulators,REALLY,they cover everything in the small print? The industry is a disgrace.

REGARDING THIS POST: Very interesting but one thing in the Moneywise investment rules at the end concerns me "Even the best investment is unlikely to deliver a return that's greater than the interest you're being charged. "If this is the case why would anyone invest?"

This relates to investors who have debts - the income earned on investments is unlikely to exceed the interest that is racking up on debts like credit cards and loans. I hope this clarifies.

 

 

 so im new to this can anyone help? how would i start investing? who would i contact ? would there be fees involved?
 
sorry likei say im new to all this