Fact sheet: Zurich Jupiter Merl Ww Pfl Pn

Fund information
Fund name
Zurich Jupiter Merlin Ww Pfolio Pn ZP
Fund manager company
Zurich Assurance Ltd
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund managers
  • Algy Smith-Maxwellsince 29/09/1999
  • John Chatfeild-Robertssince 29/04/1997
Underlying fund
Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Ptfl
Fund objective
To achieve long-term capital growth by investing predominantly in unit trusts, OEICs, Exchange Traded Funds and other collective investment schemes across several management groups. The underlying funds invest in international equities, fixed interest stocks, commodities and property.The fund objective was changed with effect from 17th July 2006.
Benchmark
  • No Specified Index
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Quick stats
1 Year return
17%
1 Year rank in sector
577/961
Sector
PN Global Equities
Yield
-
Fund size
£2m (£2m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
94
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
AXA Wealth Sch ISF Gbl Recv Pn34.5%
OMW IPL M&G Global Dividend Pn32.2%
LV= M&G Global Div Pn32.2%
Aviva M&G Global Div Pn31.4%
Stan Life M&G Global Dividend Pn31.2%
...more in PN Global Equities

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • USA44.3%
    International35.9%
    Europe12.2%
    Japan7.4%
    Money Market0.2%
  • Financials97.6%
    Others2.3%
    Money Market0.1%
  • US Equities44.3%
    International Equities33.7%
    European Equities12.2%
    Japanese Equities7.4%
    Others2.2%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund-1.8%2.9%17%17%33.3%65.4%
Sector-1.9%2.7%15.4%17.8%32.6%78.7%
Rank within sector469 / 1039513 / 1035424 / 1025577 / 961409 / 848612 / 745
Quartile2nd2nd2nd3rd2nd4th
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20162015201420132012
Fund16.6%4.3%8.2%14.7%8.1%
Sector17.7%3.7%7.8%21.4%11.2%
Rank within sector596 / 963406 / 921353 / 849743 / 820654 / 752
Quartile3rd2nd2nd4th4th
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-0.22
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
1.04
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
0.65
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
10.8
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
2.94
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
0.03
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.93
Price movement
52 week high234.7
52 week low174.2
Current bid price-
Current offer price-
Current mid price227.3
Region
1USA44.29%
2International35.91%
3Europe12.19%
4Japan7.44%
5Money Market0.16%
Industry sector
1Financials97.59%
2Others2.28%
3Money Market0.13%
Asset type
1US Equities44.29%
2International Equities33.75%
3European Equities12.19%
4Japanese Equities7.44%
5Others2.16%
6Money Market0.16%
Individual holdings
No data available.
Management
Fund manager group
Zurich
Fund manager company
Zurich Assurance Ltd
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund objective
To achieve long-term capital growth by investing predominantly in unit trusts, OEICs, Exchange Traded Funds and other collective investment schemes across several management groups. The underlying funds invest in international equities, fixed interest stocks, commodities and property.The fund objective was changed with effect from 17th July 2006.
Benchmark
  • No Specified Index
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Fund managers
NameSinceBiography
Algy Smith-Maxwell29/09/1999Algy Smith-Maxwell joined Jupiter in 2001 and is currently a fund manager in the Jupiter Independent Funds Team, which is responsible for managing the Jupiter Merlin Portfolios. Before joining Jupiter, Algy started his career in 1995 as a fund analyst for Henderson's before becoming a fund manager for Lazard Asset Management in 1999.
John Chatfeild-Roberts29/04/1997John joined Jupiter in 2001 and is currently Head of Strategy, Independent Funds. During his time at Jupiter John has established the award-winning Jupiter Independent Funds Team, which continues to manage the Jupiter Merlin Portfolios. John was appointed as Jupiter’s Chief Investment Officer in 2010. He stood down from this role in September 2015 to focus on running the portfolios. John is also a Director of Jupiter Fund Management PLC. John started his fund management career at Henderson's and also worked at Lazard Asset Management. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment.
Compliance
No data available.
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
Zurich Jupiter Merlin Ww Pfolio Pn Inet
Initial charge-
Annual charge-
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)-
Bid price204
Offer price204
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated01/12/2016
Type-
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeAIS8
Zurich Jupiter Merlin Ww Pfolio Pn ZP
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.65%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)1.72%
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price227.3
CurrencyGBX
Price updated01/12/2016
Type-
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeZ326
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.