Fact sheet: Royal London GMAP Dynamic

Fund information
Fund name
Royal London GMAP Dynamic M Acc
Fund manager company
Royal London Unit Tst Mgrs Ltd
Fund type
OEIC
Fund manager
  • Trevor Greethamsince 14/03/2016
Fund objective
The Fund aims to deliver capital growth, over an investment cycle of approximately 6 to 7 years, by investing in a diversified portfolio of UK and global equities. The Fund seeks to provide the highest level of return with the highest level of risk when compared to other funds within the range.
Benchmark
No data available.
Investment style
Growth
Investment method
Shares
Quick stats
1 Year return
28.6%
1 Year rank in sector
142/241
Sector
UT Global
Yield
1.5%
Ongoing charge (OCF)
?A fund’s ongoing charges figure (OCF) is similar to the old-style total expense ratio. It reflects the annual charge to investors in the fund, in percentage terms, but does not include extra performance-related fees (where these are levied) or the fund’s trading expenses on its underlying investments.
0.58%
Fund size
£38m (£30m last year)
Mid price
127.8
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
Natixis HarsAsGblConcntdEq53%
Baillie Gifford Global Select44.7%
NFU Mutual Global Growth44.3%
R&M World Recovery43.6%
Aubrey GblConviction42.2%
...more in UT Global

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • UK48.3%
    USA25.9%
    Japan4.6%
    Money Market2.2%
    France1.9%
  • Financials20.5%
    Alternative Assets12.8%
    Consumer Goods12.3%
    Industrials10.4%
    Consumer Services9.3%
  • UK Equities42.1%
    US Equities22.6%
    Alternative Assets12.8%
    Japanese Equities4%
    Money Market1.9%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund3.2%1%9.3%28.6%--
Sector2.1%1.1%8.5%28.1%40.5%83.7%
Rank within sector65 / 255122 / 25192 / 250142 / 241--
Quartile2nd2nd2nd3rd
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund4.8%----
Sector4.9%21%3.4%6.7%19.7%
Rank within sector131 / 251----
Quartile3rd
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
-
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
-
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
-
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
-
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
-
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
-
Price movement
52 week high129.5
52 week low99
Current bid price-
Current offer price-
Current mid price127.8
Region
1UK48.31%
2USA25.87%
3Japan4.63%
4Money Market2.18%
5France1.88%
6Germany1.81%
7Switzerland1.68%
8Canada1.55%
9Australia1.43%
Industry sector
1Financials20.53%
2Alternative Assets12.79%
3Consumer Goods12.33%
4Industrials10.38%
5Consumer Services9.32%
6Health Care8.3%
7Oil & Gas7.09%
8Technology6.06%
9Basic Materials4.9%
Asset type
1UK Equities42.13%
2US Equities22.56%
3Alternative Assets12.79%
4Japanese Equities4.04%
5Money Market1.9%
6French Equities1.64%
7German Equities1.58%
8Swiss Equities1.46%
9Canadian Equities1.36%
Individual holdings
1ROYAL LONDON US TRACKER Z ACC24.6%
2ROYAL LONDON UK ALL SHARE TRACKER Z ACC24.5%
3ROYAL LONDON FTSE 350 TRACKER Z ACC20.7%
4RL EUROPE EX UK TRACKER FUND Z ACC7.8%
5FTSE 100 FUTURES MARCH 20174.8%
6ROYAL LONDON JAPAN TRACKER Z ACC4.4%
7ROYAL LONDON ASIA PACIFIC EX JAPAN TRACKER Z ACC4.3%
8VANGUARD FTSE FD - EMERGING MARKETS ETF3.5%
9S&P500 FUTURE SEP 20162.5%
Management
Fund manager group
Royal London Unit Tst Mgrs
Fund manager company
Royal London Unit Tst Mgrs Ltd
Fund type
OEIC
Fund objective
The Fund aims to deliver capital growth, over an investment cycle of approximately 6 to 7 years, by investing in a diversified portfolio of UK and global equities. The Fund seeks to provide the highest level of return with the highest level of risk when compared to other funds within the range.
Benchmark
No data available.
Investment style
Growth
Investment method
Shares
Fund manager
NameSinceBiography
Trevor Greetham14/03/2016Trevor Greetham joined RLAM as Head of Multi Asset in April 2015. He is responsible for the tactical asset allocation strategies applied in Royal London’s life and pension funds and for developing and managing new multi asset funds for institutional and retail clients. Prior to joining RLAM, Trevor was Asset Allocation Director for Fidelity Worldwide Investment, where he was responsible for implementing tactical investment decisions across a wide range of institutional and retail funds including the Fidelity Multi Asset Strategic Fund. From 1995 to 2005, Trevor was Director of Asset Allocation for Merrill Lynch. Trevor qualified as an actuary with UK life assurer Provident Mutual and has a Master of Arts in Mathematics from Cambridge University.
Compliance
IA Recognised, Non UCITS Retail Scheme
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
Royal London GMAP Dynamic M Acc
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.45%
Min single investment£10,000
Min regular saving£1,000
Available in ISAYes
Ongoing charge (OCF)0.58%
Total expense ratio (TER)-
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price127.8
CurrencyGBX
Price updated22/05/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeMZTS
Royal London GMAP Dynamic M Inc
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.45%
Min single investment£10,000
Min regular saving£1,000
Available in ISAYes
Ongoing charge (OCF)0.58%
Total expense ratio (TER)-
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price127.1
CurrencyGBX
Price updated22/05/2017
TypeIncome
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeMZTR
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.