Fact sheet: RLP Global Equity Pn

Fund information
Fund name
RLP Global Equity Pn
Fund manager company
Royal London
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund managers
  • Jane Coffeysince 01/08/2007
  • Royal London Asset Managementsince 31/05/2002
No data available.
Fund objective
The fund is designed to outperform its benchmark.The fund is designed to achieve long term capital growth by investing in a mixture of company shares both within the UK and overseas. Approximately 50% of the fund is invested within the UK, with the remainder invested overseas. The fund is predominately invested in underlying RLAM funds which aim to track their benchmarks with the allocation between these funds actively managed.
Benchmark
No data available.
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Quick stats
1 Year return
27.9%
1 Year rank in sector
725/985
Sector
PN Global Equities
Yield
-
Fund size
£86m (£73m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
92
Bid price
272.6
Offer price
287
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
Aegon Hend GlblTecPn52.9%
FL Baillie Giff LT Gbl Gth Pn50.8%
Baillie Gifford Lng Tm Gbl Gth Pn50.1%
Zurich BailGfrd LgTrmGblGth49.7%
Stan Life BGiff LgTmGlGtOEICPn48.8%
...more in PN Global Equities

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • UK46.2%
    USA26.9%
    Others7.3%
    Japan6.5%
    Money Market3.3%
  • Financials21.5%
    Consumer Goods14.1%
    Industrials12.4%
    Consumer Services10.9%
    Health Care10.1%
  • UK Equities46.2%
    US Equities26.9%
    International Equities9.2%
    Japanese Equities6.5%
    Money Market3.3%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund2.3%3.5%10%27.9%38.4%87.7%
Sector2.2%2.9%10.1%29.7%44.6%95.1%
Rank within sector426 / 1038397 / 1032527 / 1016725 / 985598 / 851581 / 769
Quartile2nd2nd3rd3rd3rd4th
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund6.3%21.2%2.6%5.9%21%
Sector6.3%22.4%3.7%7.8%21.4%
Rank within sector504 / 1017576 / 939630 / 897512 / 828538 / 800
Quartile2nd3rd3rd3rd3rd
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-0.88
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
0.92
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
0.77
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
9.34
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
2
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
-0.89
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.96
Price movement
52 week high273.6
52 week low210.2
Current bid price272.6
Current offer price287
Current mid price-
Region
1UK46.2%
2USA26.9%
3Others7.3%
4Japan6.5%
5Money Market3.3%
6Germany2.1%
7Ireland1.9%
8Not Specified1.9%
9France1.4%
Industry sector
1Financials21.5%
2Consumer Goods14.1%
3Industrials12.4%
4Consumer Services10.9%
5Health Care10.1%
6Oil & Gas8.4%
7Technology7.3%
8Basic Materials5.4%
9Telecommunications3.4%
Asset type
1UK Equities46.2%
2US Equities26.9%
3International Equities9.2%
4Japanese Equities6.5%
5Money Market3.3%
6German Equities2.1%
7Irish Equities1.9%
8French Equities1.4%
9Australian Equities1.3%
Individual holdings
1HSBC HLDGS2.73%
2BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO1.99%
3BP1.93%
4ROYAL DUTCH SHELL1.93%
5ROYAL DUTCH SHELL1.8%
6GLAXOSMITHKLINE1.79%
7CME S&P 500 EMINIFUT MAR 20171.61%
8ASTRAZENECA PLC1.37%
9DIAGEO1.18%
Management
Fund manager group
Scottish Life
Fund manager company
Royal London
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund objective
The fund is designed to outperform its benchmark.The fund is designed to achieve long term capital growth by investing in a mixture of company shares both within the UK and overseas. Approximately 50% of the fund is invested within the UK, with the remainder invested overseas. The fund is predominately invested in underlying RLAM funds which aim to track their benchmarks with the allocation between these funds actively managed.
Benchmark
No data available.
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Fund managers
NameSinceBiography
Jane Coffey01/08/2007Jane began her investment career in 1987 managing Continental European assets at Provident Mutual, before moving on to head up the European Equity teams at Royal London Asset Management (RLAM), Morley Fund Management and then later at SLCAM. She rejoined RLAM and became Head of Equities in 2003. A highly regarded Fund Manager in her own right, she brings her extensive European and UK investment experience to bear across RLAM’s Global Equity team, instilling a highperformance culture within our diverse product range. Jane has a degree in Economics and German from the University of Sussex, and is an Associate of CFA UK. She also holds an IOD Diploma in Company Direction, and is a current Director of RLAM.
Royal London Asset Management31/05/2002
Compliance
No data available.
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
RLP Global Equity Pn
Initial charge-
Annual charge1%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)1%
Bid price272.6
Offer price287
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated25/05/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeS040
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.