Fact sheet: RLP BlackRkAq UKAlStCrBdId Pn

Fund information
Fund name
RLP BlackRock Aquila UK All Stocks Corporate Bond Index Pn
Fund manager company
Royal London
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund managers
  • BlackRocksince 31/05/2009
Underlying fund
BlackRock AqLf CBd IdAlSt Pn
Fund objective
The fund aims to track its benchmark.
Benchmark
  • Markit iBoxx Sterling Non Gilts Overall
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Quick stats
1 Year return
9.2%
1 Year rank in sector
96/262
Sector
PN Sterling Corporate Bond
Yield
-
Fund size
£40m (£42m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
49
Bid price
156
Offer price
164.2
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
OMW IPL L&G AAA CrpBdOv15YIx Pn15%
BlackRock DC AqOv 15 YCrp BdIx HP14.2%
L&G PMC AAAAAA CpBd Ov15Y Id Pn13.6%
Aviva AT SF Corp Bd Pn13.1%
AEGON Long Core Plus Pn13.1%
...more in PN Sterling Corporate Bond

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund1%2.4%-1.9%9.2%20.2%34.4%
Sector0.8%2.3%-1.2%8.5%20%36.9%
Rank within sector39 / 268111 / 266214 / 26696 / 262108 / 236148 / 217
Quartile1st2nd4th2nd2nd3rd
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund1.2%9.4%0.1%10.9%0.8%
Sector1.4%9.4%0.2%10.5%1%
Rank within sector179 / 266128 / 262152 / 247108 / 236136 / 227
Quartile3rd2nd3rd2nd3rd
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-0.61
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
1.11
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
0.43
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
6.39
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
2.12
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
0.02
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.9
Price movement
52 week high161.5
52 week low142.9
Current bid price156
Current offer price164.2
Current mid price-
Region
1UK100%
Industry sector
1Corporate Bonds100%
Asset type
1UK Corporate Fixed Interest100%
Individual holdings
1AQUILA LIFE 5-15 YEAR CORP BOND INDEX FUND42.16%
2AQUILA LIFE UP 5 YEAR CORP BOND INDEX FUND29.64%
3AQUILA LIFE CORP BOND INDEX FUND OVER 15 YEAR FUND28.18%
Management
Fund manager group
Scottish Life
Fund manager company
Royal London
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund objective
The fund aims to track its benchmark.
Benchmark
  • Markit iBoxx Sterling Non Gilts Overall
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Fund managers
NameSinceBiography
BlackRock31/05/2009BlackRock Capital Management was founded in 1988. It has offices in US, UK, HK, Singapore, Sydney & Tokyo. It has multi sector expertise and depth of resources.
Compliance
No data available.
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
RLP BlackRock Aquila UK All Stocks Corporate Bond Index Pn
Initial charge-
Annual charge1%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)1%
Bid price156
Offer price164.2
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated23/03/2017
Type-
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeBJP4
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.