Fact sheet: OMW Artemis Global Energy

Fund information
Fund name
OMW Artemis Global Energy Pn
Fund manager company
Old Mutual Wlth Life As Co Ltd
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund managers
  • John Doddsince 20/04/2011
  • Richard Hulfsince 31/05/2011
Underlying fund
Artemis Global Energy
Fund objective
The OMW Artemis Global Energy Fund invests solely in the Artemis Global Energy Fund, a UK Authorised Unit trust Company managed by Artemis Fund Managers Limited. The underlying fund aims to achieve long term capital growth primarily from a portfolio of companies engaged in the oil and gas sector, energy generation and transmission. Additionally, the underlying fund may invest in companies seeking to develop and exploit new energy technologies, and companies that service the energy sector. Investments in emerging markets tend to be volatile and are usually considered to carry a greater degree of risk than investments in established markets. This relates to dealing, settlement and custody practices, the possibility of political or economic instability, and developing legal, fiscal and regulatory structures. The underlying fund invests into a relatively small number of assets, or into individual countries or a specific market sector. Such concentrated portfolios give rise to more risk than where investments are spread across a larger number of assets, countries or market sectors. The underlying fund may be denominated in or hold assets in a currency other than Sterling. The performance of the fund may therefore rise and fall as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. The underlying fund invests in bonds or money market instruments (including deposits with banks or other financial institutions). The yield and/or value of the fund will fluctuate as interest rates change. There is a possibility of default, reducing capital values. The underlying fund, or some of its underlying assets, may hold derivatives, or borrow to invest ('gearing'), and the nature of these investments can lead to a higher volatility in the price of the fund. In addition, the fund may have some exposure to credit risk if a provider of derivatives fails to honour their obligation. Some of the investments in the underlying fund can be difficult to sell at times, which could affect the price of units. It should be noted that the performance of the OMW fund will not match that of the underlying investment due to OMW fund charges, appropriate taxation adjustments and the OMW investment process.
Benchmark
  • MSCI ACWI/Energy
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Quick stats
1 Year return
30.5%
1 Year rank in sector
57/64
Sector
PN Commodity & Energy
Yield
-
Fund size
£1m (£0m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
174
Bid price
66.3
Offer price
69.7
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
L&G Investec Global Gold Pn88.4%
OMW Investec Global Gold87.4%
Aviva Invtec Gbl Gold Pn82.1%
FL BR Gold & General Pn80%
SIP BR Gold & Gen Pn78.8%
...more in PN Commodity & Energy

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • USA38.1%
    UK19.2%
    Canada10.5%
    Norway5.1%
    Sweden4.2%
  • Energy96%
    Financials1.6%
    Money Market1.3%
    Utilities1.1%
  • US Equities38.1%
    UK Equities19.2%
    Canadian Equities10.5%
    Norwegian Equities5.1%
    Swedish Equities4.2%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund-3.1%7.6%24.2%30.5%-28.9%-31%
Sector-4.7%3.7%24.2%61.8%11.2%-28%
Rank within sector43 / 6638 / 6636 / 6457 / 6463 / 6314 / 58
Quartile3rd3rd3rd4th4th1st
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20162015201420132012
Fund42.3%-29.8%-27.2%-5.4%2.3%
Sector64%-24.9%-8.9%-25%-8.8%
Rank within sector56 / 6436 / 6363 / 6310 / 631 / 58
Quartile4th3rd4th1st1st
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-11.57
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
0.64
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
-0.03
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
23.31
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
18.68
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
-0.69
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.48
Price movement
52 week high70.3
52 week low41
Current bid price66.3
Current offer price69.7
Current mid price-
Region
1USA38.07%
2UK19.23%
3Canada10.49%
4Norway5.07%
5Sweden4.25%
6Portugal3.46%
7Italy3.22%
8Russia2.98%
9China2.96%
Industry sector
1Energy96.03%
2Financials1.58%
3Money Market1.27%
4Utilities1.12%
Asset type
1US Equities38.07%
2UK Equities19.23%
3Canadian Equities10.49%
4Norwegian Equities5.07%
5Swedish Equities4.25%
6Portuguese Equities3.46%
7Italian Equities3.22%
8Russian Equities2.98%
9Chinese Equities2.96%
Individual holdings
1AFRICA ENERGY CORP6%
2HURRICANE ENERGY PLC5.21%
3CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES3.95%
4CHEVRON CORP3.91%
5ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP3.87%
6PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES CO3.74%
7GALP ENERGIA SGPS3.46%
8IMPACT OIL & GAS LIMITED ORDINARY 1P FULLY PAID3.43%
9AKER BP ASA3.28%
Management
Fund manager group
Skandia
Fund manager company
Old Mutual Wlth Life As Co Ltd
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund objective
The OMW Artemis Global Energy Fund invests solely in the Artemis Global Energy Fund, a UK Authorised Unit trust Company managed by Artemis Fund Managers Limited. The underlying fund aims to achieve long term capital growth primarily from a portfolio of companies engaged in the oil and gas sector, energy generation and transmission. Additionally, the underlying fund may invest in companies seeking to develop and exploit new energy technologies, and companies that service the energy sector. Investments in emerging markets tend to be volatile and are usually considered to carry a greater degree of risk than investments in established markets. This relates to dealing, settlement and custody practices, the possibility of political or economic instability, and developing legal, fiscal and regulatory structures. The underlying fund invests into a relatively small number of assets, or into individual countries or a specific market sector. Such concentrated portfolios give rise to more risk than where investments are spread across a larger number of assets, countries or market sectors. The underlying fund may be denominated in or hold assets in a currency other than Sterling. The performance of the fund may therefore rise and fall as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. The underlying fund invests in bonds or money market instruments (including deposits with banks or other financial institutions). The yield and/or value of the fund will fluctuate as interest rates change. There is a possibility of default, reducing capital values. The underlying fund, or some of its underlying assets, may hold derivatives, or borrow to invest ('gearing'), and the nature of these investments can lead to a higher volatility in the price of the fund. In addition, the fund may have some exposure to credit risk if a provider of derivatives fails to honour their obligation. Some of the investments in the underlying fund can be difficult to sell at times, which could affect the price of units. It should be noted that the performance of the OMW fund will not match that of the underlying investment due to OMW fund charges, appropriate taxation adjustments and the OMW investment process.
Benchmark
  • MSCI ACWI/Energy
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Fund managers
NameSinceBiography
John Dodd20/04/2011John Dodd is a co-founder of Artemis. His previous roles include working at LAS Investment Management, Gulf International Bank in Bahrain and then five years at Gartmore from 1988. Before setting up Artemis, John was senior investment manager for smaller company investments in the UK at Ivory & Sime. He managed the Artemis UK Smaller Companies Fund from its launch in April 1998 until December 2010. John manages the Artemis Global Energy Fund alongside Richard Hulf; and Artemis Alpha Trust plc alongside Adrian Paterson.
Richard Hulf31/05/2011Richard is a graduate of Imperial College with an MSc in petroleum engineering. He worked in industry for Exxon and Enterprise Oil and joined the City in 1997 as an oil analyst at Henderson Crosthwaite. He went on to Ernst & Young to work in Energy Corporate Finance, with a brief spell at Simmons & Co. He set up Hulf Hamilton, an independent oil & gas research consultancy, where he provided independent energy research to Artemis and other investment funds. He joined Artemis in June 2011 to manage the Artemis Global Energy Fund alongside John Dodd.
Compliance
UCITS IV Compliant
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
OMW Artemis Global Energy Pn
Initial charge-
Annual charge-
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)1.23%
Bid price66.3
Offer price69.7
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated01/12/2016
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi code0GAC
OMW Artemis Global Energy SP
Initial charge-
Annual charge-
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)1.23%
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price72.5
CurrencyGBX
Price updated01/12/2016
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi code0GAD
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.