Fact sheet: L&G AsPac ExJap Dev EqId PMC Pn

Fund information
Fund name
L&G Asia Pacific Ex Japan Developed Equity Index PMC Pn G17
Fund manager company
Legal & General Assurance Soc
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund manager
  • Tom Hammondsince 31/08/2008
No data available.
Fund objective
To track the sterling total returns of the FTSE World Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) developed Index (including re-invested income, less withholding tax) to within +/- 0.75% per annum for two years in three.
Benchmark
  • FTSE World Asia Pacific ex Japan
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Quick stats
1 Year return
49.5%
1 Year rank in sector
-
Sector
PN Asia Pacific Excluding Japan
Yield
-
Fund size
£8m (£6m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
116
Bid price
508.8
Offer price
508.8
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
SL SLI Indian Eq Midcap Opps Pn68.2%
FL Invesco Perp Asian Pn64.4%
Aviva Invsc Prptul AsnPn63.1%
Aviva Invesco Perpetual Asian Pn62.8%
SIP Inv Perp Asian Pn62.4%
...more in PN Asia Pacific Excluding Japan

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • Australia38.7%
    Korea26.6%
    Hong Kong19.7%
    Singapore7.9%
    Not Specified4.7%
  • Financials41.1%
    Consumer Goods15.6%
    Industrials11.1%
    Consumer Services8.4%
    Basic Materials7.8%
  • Australian Equities38.7%
    South Korean Equities26.6%
    Hong Kong Equities19.7%
    Singapore Equities7.9%
    International Equities4.7%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund3%12.4%12.3%49.5%45.3%53.6%
Sector3.4%9.3%10.2%42.4%47.1%50.6%
Rank within sector------
Quartile
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund7.4%31.3%-3.1%4%1.6%
Sector7.8%27%-3.6%8.3%0.7%
Rank within sector-----
Quartile
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-1.1
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
1.07
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
0.6
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
15.68
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
4.4
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
-0.09
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.92
Price movement
52 week high508.9
52 week low340.4
Current bid price508.8
Current offer price508.8
Current mid price-
Region
1Australia38.67%
2Korea26.56%
3Hong Kong19.66%
4Singapore7.9%
5Not Specified4.74%
6New Zealand1.45%
7Ireland0.31%
8USA0.3%
9Papua New Guinea0.26%
Industry sector
1Financials41.1%
2Consumer Goods15.55%
3Industrials11.1%
4Consumer Services8.39%
5Basic Materials7.83%
6Utilities4.13%
7Health Care3.47%
8Oil & Gas2.98%
9Technology2.85%
Asset type
1Australian Equities38.67%
2South Korean Equities26.56%
3Hong Kong Equities19.66%
4Singapore Equities7.9%
5International Equities4.74%
6New Zealand Equities1.45%
7Irish Equities0.31%
8US Equities0.3%
9Asia Pacific Equities0.26%
Individual holdings
1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO6.98%
2AUSTRALIA (COMMONWEALTH BANK OF)4.57%
3WESTPAC BANKING CORP3.54%
4AIA GROUP LTD3.41%
5AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GRP2.82%
6BHP BILLITON PLC2.67%
7NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK2.6%
8WESFARMERS1.6%
9CK HUTCHISON HLDGS LTD1.59%
Management
Fund manager group
Legal & General
Fund manager company
Legal & General Assurance Soc
Fund type
Pension Fund
Fund objective
To track the sterling total returns of the FTSE World Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) developed Index (including re-invested income, less withholding tax) to within +/- 0.75% per annum for two years in three.
Benchmark
  • FTSE World Asia Pacific ex Japan
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
No data available.
Fund manager
NameSinceBiography
Tom Hammond31/08/2008Tom joined Legal & General Investment Management in February 2000 initially as an Investment Reporting analyst and then as a fund accountant for the Linked Life fund. He manages funds in all regions of the world and currently assists with the management of UK, Global and Asia Pacific equity funds.
Compliance
No data available.
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
L&G Asia Pacific Ex Japan Developed Equity Index PMC Pn 3
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.14%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)0.14%
Bid price504.6
Offer price504.6
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated22/02/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeNDF1
L&G Asia Pacific Ex Japan Developed Equity Index PMC Pn G17
Initial charge-
Annual charge-
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)-
Bid price508.8
Offer price508.8
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated22/02/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeEJY9
L&G Asia Pacific Ex Japan Developed Equity Index PMC Pn G25
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.25%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)0.25%
Bid price4968.4
Offer price4968.4
Mid price-
CurrencyGBX
Price updated22/02/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeAMD2
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.