Fact sheet: JPMorgan Evergreen

Fund information
Fund name
JPMorgan Evergreen NAV
Fund manager company
JP Morgan Funds (Asia) Limited
Fund type
Unit Trust
Fund managers
  • Leon Goldfeldsince 03/05/2016
Fund objective
To seek to produce a competitive total return in different market conditions by means of an actively managed portfolio of collective investment schemes managed by the Manager, its connected parties or external parties.
Benchmark
  • No Specified Index
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
Equity, Fixed Interest
Quick stats
1 Year return
10.6%
1 Year rank in sector
66/136
Sector
FO Mixed Asset - Balanced
Yield
-
Ongoing charge (OCF)
?A fund’s ongoing charges figure (OCF) is similar to the old-style total expense ratio. It reflects the annual charge to investors in the fund, in percentage terms, but does not include extra performance-related fees (where these are levied) or the fund’s trading expenses on its underlying investments.
1.95%
Fund size
£32m (£34m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
87
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
Templeton Emg Mkts Bal29%
Capital Group EMTOpL28.6%
HSBC GIF MS Asia Focsd Gth27.6%
HSBC Pfl World Seltn 324.9%
SEI Balanced22.5%
...more in FO Mixed Asset - Balanced

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • Not Specified30%
    USA25.7%
    Asia23.7%
    Europe12.4%
    Global Emerging Markets4.2%
  • No data available.
  • Global Fixed Interest30%
    US Equities25.7%
    Asia Pacific Equities23.7%
    European Equities12.4%
    Global Emerging Market Equities4.2%

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund2.2%2.5%7.8%10.6%7.3%29.1%
Sector1.1%1.7%6%10.7%12.7%30.7%
Rank within sector30 / 14738 / 14833 / 14466 / 13695 / 11259 / 86
Quartile1st2nd1st2nd4th3rd
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund6.4%1.2%-1.5%-0.2%14%
Sector4%5.2%-0.3%4.7%7.5%
Rank within sector18 / 146115 / 13279 / 122104 / 11013 / 97
Quartile1st4th3rd4th1st
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
-2.77
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
1.26
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
-0
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
7.6
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
3.49
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
-0.52
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.82
Price movement
52 week high20.18
52 week low17.79
Current bid price-
Current offer price-
Current mid price19.94
Region
1Not Specified30%
2USA25.7%
3Asia23.7%
4Europe12.4%
5Global Emerging Markets4.2%
6Money Market4%
Industry sector
No data available.
Asset type
1Global Fixed Interest30%
2US Equities25.7%
3Asia Pacific Equities23.7%
4European Equities12.4%
5Global Emerging Market Equities4.2%
6Alternative Assets2.8%
7Money Market1.2%
Individual holdings
1JPMF - US AGGREGATE BOND FUND15.3%
2JPMORGAN SAR AMERICAN FUND12.6%
3JPMORGAN DIVERSIFIED RETURN US MID CAP ETF9.3%
4JPMF - US SELECT EQUITY PLUS FUND8.7%
5JPMF - US RESEARCH ENHANCED INDEX EQUITY FUND8.1%
Management
Fund manager group
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
Fund manager company
JP Morgan Funds (Asia) Limited
Fund type
Unit Trust
Fund objective
To seek to produce a competitive total return in different market conditions by means of an actively managed portfolio of collective investment schemes managed by the Manager, its connected parties or external parties.
Benchmark
  • No Specified Index
Investment style
No data available.
Investment method
Equity, Fixed Interest
Fund managers
NameSinceBiography
Leon Goldfeld03/05/2016Leon Goldfeld is the Director of Investment and responsible for the management of Balanced Portfolios at Amundi Hong-Kong Prior to joining Amundi, he was Managing Director, Investment Strategy Group at Goldman Sachs Private Wealth Management, focusing on emerging market equity strategy. From 2004 to 2010, Leon was Chief Investment Officer at HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong), where he managed over US$20 billion of multi asset accounts and led an investment team covering strategic and tactical asset allocation investment research. He started his career in AXA Investment Managers, Australia in 1988 and was promoted to Chief Investment Officer of AXA Investment Manager, Hong Kong in 2001, where he managed an investment team and oversaw the management of a range of instruments covering multi asset accounts, Asian equities, Asian fixed income and special situation hedge fund. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst charterholder since 1997. He received a Bachelor degree in Science (Computer Science, Accounting and Economics) from Monash University in Melbourne.
Compliance
No data available.
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom, Gulf Cooperation Council, Hong Kong, Offshore, Singapore
JPMorgan Evergreen NAV
Initial charge3%
Annual charge0.5%
Min single investment£5,000
Min regular saving£5,000
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)1.95%
Total expense ratio (TER)1.95%
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price19.94
CurrencyUSD
Price updated18/05/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classRetail
Domicile-
Citi codeK346
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.