Fact sheet: Artemis Inst Gbl Cap

Fund information
Fund name
Artemis Institutional Global Capital IN Acc
Fund manager company
Artemis Fund Managers Limited
Fund type
Unit Trust
Fund manager
  • Peter Saackesince 30/07/2006
Fund objective
The fund aims to provide investors with capital growth from a diversified portfolio investing in any economic sector in any part of the world.
Benchmark
  • MSCI AC World
Investment style
Active,Growth
Investment method
Shares
Quick stats
1 Year return
34.9%
1 Year rank in sector
71/253
Sector
UT Global
Yield
1.6%
Ongoing charge (OCF)
?A fund’s ongoing charges figure (OCF) is similar to the old-style total expense ratio. It reflects the annual charge to investors in the fund, in percentage terms, but does not include extra performance-related fees (where these are levied) or the fund’s trading expenses on its underlying investments.
0.81%
Fund size
£162m (£139m last year)
FE Risk score
?FE Risk Scores measure the riskiness of instruments relative to the FTSE 100 index of shares. Weekly volatility is measured over three years with recent behaviour counting more heavily than earlier behaviour. Cash-type investments will have scores close to zero. Funds will tend to have scores in the 0-150 range. The FTSE 100 is always scored at 100. There is no upper limit.
100
Top in this sector
Fund name1 Year
First State Gbl Resrcs66.1%
Natixis HarsAsGblConcntdEq55.3%
NFU Mutual Global Growth54.5%
Investec Gbl Spcl Situations53%
R&M World Recovery52.9%
...more in UT Global

Performance snapshot

Holdings snapshot

  • USA32.3%
    China9%
    UK7.1%
    Japan6.8%
    Germany5.8%
  • Banks16.1%
    Materials14.3%
    Energy10.9%
    Capital Goods9.7%
    Automotive8%
  • US Equities32.3%
    Chinese Equities7.7%
    UK Equities7.1%
    Japanese Equities6.8%
    German Equities5.8%

Fund also available on these pension platforms:

Performance vs Sector

Cumulative performance
 1 mth3 mth6 mth1 yr3 yr5 yr
Fund2.8%8.3%13.3%34.9%65.7%118.8%
Sector2.4%6.7%9.6%30.3%38.2%67.6%
Rank within sector106 / 26932 / 26338 / 26071 / 2536 / 2299 / 204
Quartile2nd1st1st2nd1st1st
Calendar performance
 YTD - 20172016201520142013
Fund4.2%23.9%7.8%18.1%24.8%
Sector3.5%21%3.4%6.7%19.7%
Rank within sector78 / 264100 / 25044 / 2387 / 22566 / 213
Quartile2nd2nd1st1st2nd
Risk statistics
Alpha
?Alpha is a measure of a fund's over- or under-performance by comparison to its benchmark. If the Alpha is 5, the fund has outperformed its benchmark by 5%; so the greater the Alpha, the greater the outperformance.
6.3
Beta
?Beta estimates a fund's volatility by comparison to that of its benchmark. A fund with a beta close to 1 means that the fund will move generally in line with the benchmark. Higher than 1 and the fund is more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.
0.94
Sharpe
?This commonly-used measure calculates the level of return over and above the return of a notional risk-free investment, such as cash. The difference in returns is then divided by the fund's volatility. The resulting ratio is an indication of the amount of excess return generated per unit of risk.
1.5
Volatility
?Volatility (or standard deviation), when applied to an investment fund, expresses its risk. It shows how widely a range of returns varied from the fund's average return over a particular period. For example, if a fund had an average return of 5%, and its volatility was 15, this would mean that the range of its returns over the period had swung between +20% and -10%.
10
Tracking error
?This measures the standard deviation of a fund's excess returns over the returns of an index or benchmark portfolio. As such, it can be an indication of 'riskiness' in the manager's investment style. A Tracking Error below 2 suggests a passive approach. At 3 and above the the manager will be deploying a more active investment style.
3.11
Information ratio
?This is a useful risk-adjusted measure of actively managed fund performance. It is calculated by deducting the returns of the fund's benchmark from the fund's overall returns, then dividing the result by its tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio the better. It is generally considered that a figure of 0.5 reflects a good performance, 0.75 very good, and 1.00 outstanding.
1.78
R-Squared
?An indication of how closely correlated a fund is to an index or a benchmark. Values for R-Squared range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no correlation at all and 1 showing a perfect match. Values upwards of 0.7 suggest that the fund's behaviour is increasingly linked to its benchmark.
0.9
Price movement
52 week high139.91
52 week low102.99
Current bid price-
Current offer price-
Current mid price137.88
Region
1USA32.28%
2China8.96%
3UK7.06%
4Japan6.82%
5Germany5.76%
6France5.34%
7Korea3.68%
8Money Market2.75%
9Canada2.64%
Industry sector
1Banks16.11%
2Materials14.33%
3Energy10.94%
4Capital Goods9.68%
5Automotive8.04%
6Hardware7.04%
7Insurance3.96%
8Consumer Durables3.61%
9Retail3.52%
Asset type
1US Equities32.28%
2Chinese Equities7.69%
3UK Equities7.06%
4Japanese Equities6.82%
5German Equities5.76%
6French Equities5.34%
7South Korean Equities3.68%
8Money Market2.75%
9Canadian Equities2.64%
Individual holdings
1APPLE INC1.77%
2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.74%
3SIEMENS AG1.58%
4TOTAL SA1.53%
5LUKOIL PJSC1.41%
6RIO TINTO1.27%
7GENERAL MOTORS CO1.26%
8JP MORGAN STRUCTURED PRODUCTS BV LEPO WTS 20/04/20(CHINA STATE)USD0.00011.26%
9BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG1.23%
Management
Fund manager group
Artemis
Fund manager company
Artemis Fund Managers Limited
Fund type
Unit Trust
Fund objective
The fund aims to provide investors with capital growth from a diversified portfolio investing in any economic sector in any part of the world.
Benchmark
  • MSCI AC World
Investment style
Active,Growth
Investment method
Shares
Fund manager
NameSinceBiography
Peter Saacke30/07/2006Peter joined Artemis in December 2002 from Merrill Lynch, where he worked as pan-European equity strategist and quantitative economist from 1999. Peter holds a BA in mathematics and philosophy from the University of Oxford, an MA in economics from Freiburg University and a PhD in economics from Hamburg University. In 1998 he was a visiting researcher at the European University Institute in Florence. Peter is a CFA charterholder. He has managed the Artemis European Growth Fund with Philip Wolstencroft since December 2002 and took over the management of the Artemis Global Growth Fund in January 2004. He has managed the Artemis Global Emerging Markets Fund since its launch in April 2015.
Compliance
IA Recognised, Non UCITS Retail Scheme
Domicile
No data available.
Fund for sale in
United Kingdom
Artemis Institutional Global Capital IN Acc
Initial charge-
Annual charge0.75%
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£500
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)0.81%
Total expense ratio (TER)0.79%
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price137.88
CurrencyGBX
Price updated24/02/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classInstitutional
Domicile-
Citi codeI727
Artemis Institutional Global Capital IN Acc SNAV
Initial charge-
Annual charge-
Min single investment£0
Min regular saving£0
Available in ISANo
Ongoing charge (OCF)-
Total expense ratio (TER)-
Bid price-
Offer price-
Mid price137.88
CurrencyGBX
Price updated24/02/2017
TypeAccumulation
Institutional or retail classInstitutional
Domicile-
Citi codeN12O
Data provided by

The Content is only for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. The Content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation or arrangement by Moneywise and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.

This information is sourced from our partner Financial Express. We believe the data to be correct however you should take care in using any information.

You should be aware that prices may fall as well as rise and that the income derived can go down as well as up. When buying or selling any investment that fluctuates in price or value you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.