As someone on a low-ish wage (well, less than £200k) then I'd say yes! But realistically, this is not going to go down well ... can you image what the Torys would say! Gordon Brown would risk losing loads of votes from people on high salaries (all those City Boys) and he would never do that. Plus it would lead to people fiddling their salaries to avoid having to pay more income tax... sorry, but the more I think about it this is a stupid idea but it's scary that it has actually been proposed.
Here's another question - should think-tanks be forced to come up with useful ideas rather than just stuff that gets headlines but is totally bonkers?
I agree, council tax should depend on where you live and what services you receive. In this way, the rich would sort of subsidize the rest of us because they probably live in posher areas and would pay more.
I have to say though I'm not all that clear on how council tax is calculated - it's not very transparent!
The rich already subsidise council tax bills! Most of the money spent by councils goes on education, healthcare, social services and roads. Anyone earning over £200k is proabably paying the top rate of council tax but not getting anything back in return. Most likely their children are educated privately, they have private healthcare and dont use the roads becuase they need to work 14+ hours a day to earn that amount! Instead of always looking for someone else to shoulder the burden of rising council tax, why not ask why it is so high in the first place and why it has to go up by 4%? I dont see any think-tanks tackling that one!
I hate it when the wealthy whinge about council tax...rather than basing the rate of council tax you pay on the size of your property (just because you have a big doesn't mean you're rich) it should depend on your income.
Hear hear to the pensioners who are risking jail to highlight just how unfair this is.
Why? After my single person discount of 25%;I recieve my "wheely bin" emptied by my COUNCIL.I don't use Schools or swimming pool,Library :as a single person ,I subsidize the local families enough!Although I am not rich ;why should I be penalized for someone elses kids! Brian.
What do you mean by "subsidise". In theory the rich have always subsidised the poor, its the basis on which our society works. However, in recent years, and since Mrs T scrapped the higher taxation rates, the rich have pushed ahead in the finance stakes well away from the majority of us.
Our public finance model has been tinkered with by successive Governments so much over the years that it is now almost totally useless. It would be a brave politician, not something that they are known for, that proposes a really radical overhaul.
How about getting another off the shelf from one of our European neighbours. Any suggestions which one.?
So because I choose to spend my modest income on buying a larger house rather than blowing it by going to the pub, bookies or whatever, I am classed as rich and should subsidise someone earning probably more than myself (especially if there is more than one wage earner in the household) into the bargain.
News, articles, advice and guides from everyday money issues to how to grow your money. Covering all aspects of personal finance, Moneywise offers independent news and views, forums and blogs, as well as unique compare and buy comparison tools.
Moneywise distributes services supplied by Interactive Investor. Interactive Investor Trading Limited, trading as "Interactive Investor", is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Copyright © 2008 Moneywise. Terms & Conditions About Contact us Subscriptions
Council tax bills are set to rise 4% this year.
A think-tank has proposed that people who earn over £200,000 should pay extra income tax which could be used to keep council tax bills down.
But what do you think? Should the "rich" pay more in income tax in order to save people on lower incomes digging deep to meet their council tax bills?